Collective guilt, individual and prospective responsibility

a critical approach to contemporary transitional justice

Authors

  • Gianluca Ronca Collegio Ghislieri - IUSS Pavia

Keywords:

transitional justice, human rights, philosophy of international law, restorative and reparative justice, truth and reconciliation commissions

Abstract

Beginning with a brief presentation of the historical data and conceptual issues that have led to the emergence of the doctrine of the notion of Transitional Justice, I will describe the orientation adopted in two paradigmatic historical contexts, the Nuremberg trial at the end of the Second World War and the post-apartheid reconciliation process in South Africa. Supported by documents from International Human Rights Law and other international legal sources (Rome Statute)  I will then offer a provisional definition of what I call a Critical Transitional Justice. The conclusion highlights how the relationship between retrospective and prospective responsibility today is not exclusionary: as central principles of Critical Transitional Justice, they contribute in conferring normative legitimacy to transformative processes of adapting the international system to compliance to general principles of human rights.

References

Benveniste, Émile. The Vocabulary of Indo-European Institutions. Vol. I. Turin: Einaudi, 1976.

de Greiff, Pablo. “ ‘Human Rights and Transitional Justice’. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence”, 5 October, 2016. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/803412.

Eberhard, Harald, Lachmayer, Konrad and Gerhard Thallinger. Transitional Constitutionalism: Proceedings of the 2nd Vienna Workshop on International Constitutional Law. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007.

International Law Commission. “Draft articles on Responsibility of States for InternationallyWrongful Acts, with commentaries”. 2001. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/ english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf.

Feinberg, Joel. Doing and Deserving. Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1970.

Habermas, Jünger and Adam Michnik. “Overcoming the past”. New Left Review, no. 203 (1994): 3-16.

Hayner, Priscilla B. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. London: Routledge, 2010.

Jaspers, Karl. La questione della colpa. Edited by A. Pinotti. Milan: Cortina Editore, 1996.

Joinet, Louis. “The administration of justice and the human rights of detainees: question of the impunity of perpetrators of human rights violations (civil and political), revised final report.” 1997. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/245520.

Krog, Antjie. Country of My Skull: Guilt, Sorrow and the Limits of Forgiveness in the New South Africa. New York: Three Rivers Press, 2000.

Lollini, Andrea. Constitutionalism and Transitional Justice in South Africa. Oxford, N. Y.: Berghahn Books, 2011.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.

Moon, Claire. Narrating Political Reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Lanham, Lexington Books, 2008.

Moore, Michael S. Law and Psychiatry. Rethinking the Relationship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

Murphy, Coleen. Conceptual Foundations of Transitional Justice. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Paige, Arthur. “How ‘transitions’ reshaped human rights: a conceptual history of transitional justice”. Human Rights Quarterly, no. 31 (2009): 321-367.

Priemel, Kim C., and Alexa Stiller (eds.). Reassessing the Nuremberg Military Tribunals: Transitional Justice, Trial Narratives, and Historiography. Berghahn Books, 2012.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

Reginbogin, Herbert R., and Christoph. J. M. Safferling. The Nuremberg Trials: International Criminal Law Since 1945. Boston: De Gruyter, 2006.

Schaap, Allard. ``Guilty subjects and political responsibility: Arendt, Jaspers and the resonance of the ’German Question’ in politics of reconciliation.”. Political Studies, no. 49 (2001): 749-766.

Smiley, Marion. “Collective responsibility”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford. edu/archives/sum2017/entries/ collective-responsibility.

South African Government. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, source https://www.gov.za/documents/ constitution-republic-south-africa- 1996.

Teitel, Ruti. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Tutu, Desmond. No Future Without Forgiveness. New York: Image Books, 2000.

United Nations Secretary General. “Implementing the responsibility to protect: accountability for prevention”. 10 August, 2017. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/ documents/2017%20SG%20report% 20on%20RtoP%20Ad- 122 July 2022 – vanced%20copy.pdf.

United Nations. “Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.” https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/ files/RS-Eng.pdf.

von Hirsch, Andrew, Roberts, Julian, Bottoms, Anthony E., Roach, Kent and Mra Schiff. Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2003.

Wilson, Richard A. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Published

2022-07-15

Issue

Section

Academic Articles