Divination and contemporaneity: different thoughts of Schleiermacher and Kierkegaard on hermeneutics

Yufeng Huang

doi:10.59391/inscriptions.v6i1.185

Authors

Yufeng Huang The University of Macau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59391/inscriptions.v6i1.185

Keywords:

Schleiermacher, Kierkegaard, hermeneutics

Abstract

This article compares two essential concepts: one is Schleiermacher’s divination, and another is Kierkegaard’s contemporaneity. These concepts cannot be understood without “religiousness”. The first part of this article presents a preliminary study on the convergence and divergence of Schleiermacher and Kierkegaard on religiousness. While Schleiermacher presupposes what being religious is and describes what it is to be a Christian, Kierkegaard focuses on how to be religious and become a Christian. The second part focuses on Schleiermacher’s theory of hermeneutics. A mysterious and intuitive interpretation, namely the divinatory, reveals its similar construction to Schleiermacher’s religiousness. The last part interprets Schleiermacher through Kierkegaard by opposing contemporaneity to divination. While divination can be regarded as a state in which readers become contemporary with the original author, Kierkegaard regards this approach as a leap in the immediacy that focuses on “whatness” instead of “howness”. Compared to Schleiermacher, Kierkegaard introduces an existential mode of understanding.

References

Beyers, Jaco. “On the border between religion and superstition: Schleiermacher on religion.” Theological Studies 77, no. 2 (2021): e1-e9.

Capetz, P.E. “Theology and the non-theological study of religion: a critical assessment of Schleiermacher’s legacy.” In Schleiermacher und Kierkegaard: Subjektivität und Wahrheit - Akten des Schleiermacher-Kierkegaard-Kongresses, edited by Niels Cappelørn, 179-196. Copenhagen: De Gruyter, 2006.

Crouter, R.. “More than kindred spirits: Kierkegaard and Schleiermacher on repentance.” In Schleiermacher und Kierkegaard, 673-686.

Dalferth, V.I. “Die Sache ist viel entsetzlicher: Religiosität bei Kierkegaard und Schleiermacher.” In Schleiermacher und Kierkegaard, 217-264.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. “The rise of hermeneutics.” In The hermeneutic tradition: from Ast to Ricoeur, edited by G.L. Ormiston and A.D. Schrift, 101-114. New York: State University of New York, 1985.

Dole, Andrew. “Schleiermacher on religion.” Religious Compass 4, no. 2 (2010): 75-85.

Ferreira, M.J. “The single individual and kinship: reflection on Kierkegaard and Schleiermacher.” In Schleiermacher und Kierkegaard, 125-144.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and method. Translated by J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 2004.

Kangas, D. “The metaphysics of interiority: the two paths of Schleiermacher and Kierkegaard.” In Schleiermacher und Kierkegaard, 655-672.

Kierkegaard, Søren. Philosophical fragments. Edited and translated by H.V. and E.H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.

Kierkegaard, Søren. Fear and trembling. Edited and translated by H.V. and E.H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.

Kierkegaard, Søren. Concluding unscientific postscript to philosophical fragments. Edited and translated by H.V. and E.H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.

Kierkegaard, Søren. Kierkegaard’s journals and notebooks, vol. 1-9. Edited and translated by Niels Cappelørn, Alastair Hannay, David Kangas et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007-2017.

Kierkegaard, Søren. Papers and journals: a selection. Translated by Alastair Hannay, Penguin, 1996.

Palmer, R.E. Hermeneutics: interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Northwestern University Press. 1969.

Rajan, Tilottama. The supplement of reading: figures of understanding in romantic theory and practice. London: Cornell University Press, 1990.

Rogers, C.D. “Schleiermacher, Kierkegaard, and the problem of first immediacy.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80, no. 3 (2016): 259-278.

Rogers, C.D. “Schleiermacher in the Kierkegaardian project: between Socratic ignorance and second immediacy.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 21, no. 1 (2016): 141-158.

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. “Foundations: general theory and art of interpretation.” In The hermeneutics reader, edited by Mueller-Vollmer. New York: Continuum, 1985.

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. On religion: speeches to its cultured despisers. Translated by John Oman. New York: Harper & Brothers, 2006/1958.

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. The Christian faith. Translated by Paul T. Nimmo. New York: Bloomsbury, 2016.

Schreiber, G. “The real targets of Kierkegaard’s critique of characterizing faith as `the immediate’.” Acta Kierkegaardiana 5 (2011): 137-167.

Smith, J.H. “Living religion as vanishing mediator: Schleiermacher, early romanticism, and idealism.” The German Quarterly 84, no. 2 (2011): 137-158.

Stoellger. “Sprachdenken zwischen Schleiermacher, Kierkegaard und Rosenzweig. Zum Vor- und Nachleben des Sprachdenkens in hermeneutischer Perspektive.” Naharaim 4, no. 1 (2011): 97-119.