The omnipresent character and possible worlds theory
the case of Judge Holden in Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59391/inscriptions.v7i1.201Keywords:
possible worlds, storyworld, Cormac McCarthy, omnipresenceAbstract
Fictional texts might present storyworlds that include both human characters and omnipresent characters. When they share the same ontological plane the specific dynamic occurs between them. Furthermore omnipresent characters may be able to transgress a singular plane, in consequence making the whole storyworld appear more complex, but also seem less coherent. This essay focuses on the case of Judge Holden, the antagonist of Cormac McCarthy’s novel Blood Meridian, in order to dissect the role of an omnipresent character within the fictional world. The introduction contextualizes the figure of an omnipresent character, by explicating its nature on the background of other texts and their characters. Applying the possible worlds theory adapted by literary theorist Marie-Laure Ryan serves as the adequate means of analysis. Her take on possible worlds theory enables to make a clear distinctions between ontological planes that an omnipresent character occupies and define what it means for the reader.
References
Breen, Nathan Alan. The Voice of Evil: A narratological study of demonic characters in Old English literature. University of Illinois at Urbana-Campaign, 2003.
Collins, Andrew. “The divinity of the Pharaoh in Greek sources.” The Classical Quarterly 64, no. 2 (2014): 841-844.
Comyn, Joshua. “‘What’s he a judge of?’: the effacement of agency and an ethics of reading in Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian.”The Cormac McCarthy Journal 13, no. 1 (2015): 54-71.
Crawford, Kate. Atlas of AI: power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press, 2021.
Dorson, James. “Demystifying the judge: law and mythical violence in Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian.” Journal of Modern Literature 36, no. 2 (2013): 105-121.
Godfrey, Harold. “God’s omnipotence: a literary investigation”Pharos Journal of Theology, vol. 103 (2022): 1-11.
Hermann, Isabella. “Artificial intelligence in fiction: between narratives and metaphors.” AI & Soc 38, 4 (2023): 319-329.
La Croix, Richard R. “The impossibility of defining ‘omnipotence.’”Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 32, no. 2 (1977): 181-190.
McCarthy, Cormac. Blood Meridian. New York: Random House, 1985.
Pavel, Thomas G. “‘Possible worlds’ in literary semantics.”The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34, no. 2 (1975): 165-176.
Peak, David. “Horror of the Real: H.P. Lovecraft’s Old Ones and contemporary speculative philosophy.” In Diseases of the Head: essays on the horrors of speculative philosophy, edited by Matt Rosen, 163-180. Punctum Books, 2020.
Ryan, Marie-Laure “From possible worlds to storyworlds.” In Possible Worlds Theory and Contemporary Narratology, edited by Alice Bell and Marie-Laure Ryan, 62-87. University of Nebraska Press, 2019.
Ryan, Marie-Laure. A New Anatomy of Storyworlds: what is, what if, as if. The Ohio State University Press, 2022.
Shaviro, Steven. “The very life of darkness.” In Perspectives on Cormac McCarthy, edited by Edith T. Arnold and Dianne C. Lucce, 145-158. University Press of Mississippi, 1999.
Versnel, H.S. Coping With the Gods: wayward readings in greek theology. Brill, 2011.
Wetters, Kirk. Demonic History: from Goethe to the present. Northwestern University Press, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mikolaj Marks

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit manuscripts and publish with Inscriptions retain copyright to their original work and agree to the following terms:
- Inscriptions is granted the right to first publish the work under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License unless otherwise agreed in writing prior to publication;
- Inscriptions and its publisher Tankebanen forlag is granted the right to produce and reproduce the work in any form, printed or electronically, for free distribution and for sale;
- Authors are permitted to post their work online and to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of their work as long as its initial publication in Inscriptions is acknowledged.