Investigating and imagining human-nature-technology relationships through dance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59391/fbbztk90Keywords:
art-humanities-science collaboration, dance-based research, moral imagination, human-environment relationships, posthumanismAbstract
An increasingly popular response to Western thinking about human dominance over nature is posthumanism. Rather than addressing the challenges of anthropocentrism by focusing on yet another grand perspective in response to it, we propose that environmental philosophers engage in arts-based research to reflect on how to relate differently to non-human life and our environment. This article explores how arts-based research, particularly dance-based methods, can enhance environmental philosophers’ moral imagination in rethinking human-environment relations. It discusses the dance film Cobalt (2024) as a case study to explore how embodied movement can explore the human-environment relationship beyond verbal discourse, leading to expressive and imaginative responses. Screenings of Cobalt in academic settings engaged participants in discussions that revealed diverse interpretations, demonstrating the film’s potential to challenge dominant perspectives on human-environment relationships and to foster the moral imagination essential for addressing current environmental crises.
References
Benjamin, Walter. “The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction.” In A museum studies approach to heritage, edited by Sheila Watson, Amy Jane Barnes, and Katy Bunning, 226-243. Routledge, 2018.
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press, 2020.
Blok, Vincent. “Geoethics beyond enmeshment: Critical Reflections on the post-humanist position in the Anthropocene.” In Geo-societal Narratives: Contextualising geosciences, edited by Martin Bohle and Eduardo Marone, 29-54. Springer, 2021.
Blumenfeld-Jones, Donald. “Dance, choreography, and social science research.” In Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues, edited by J. Gary Knowles and Ardra L. Cole, 175-184. Routledge, 2008.
Braidotti, Rosi. The posthuman. Polity Press, 2013.
Brecht, Bertolt. Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic. Macmillan, 1964.
Gallagher, Shaun. How the body shapes the mind. Clarendon Press, 2006.
Grosz, Elizabeth. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Indiana University Press, 1994.
Haraway, Donna. “A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century.” In The Transgender Studies Reader, edited by Susan Stryker and Stephen Whittle, 103-118. Routledge, 2013.
Haraway, Donna. “Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene.” In Staying with the Trouble. Duke University Press, 2016.
Hermans, Carolien. “Joint action and joint attention: Dance improvisation and children’s physical play as participatory sense-making activities.” Choreographic Practices 9, no. 2 (2018): 311-332.
Hermans, Carolien. “To touch and to be touched: Interconnectedness and participatory sense-making in play and dance improvisation.” Journal of Dance Education 22, no. 4 (2022): 211-222.
Johnson, Mark. Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. University of Chicago Press, 2014.
Kuhn, Thomas. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Latour, Bruno. We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, 2012.
Leavy, Patricia. Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. Guilford Publications, 2020.
Lehoux, Pascale, Fiona Alice Miller, and Bryn Williams-Jones. “Anticipatory governance and moral imagination: Methodological insights from a scenario-based public deliberation study.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151 (2020): 1-13.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The visible and the invisible: Followed by working notes. Northwestern University Press, 1968.
Morton, Timothy. “Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World.” University of Minnesota Press, 2013.
Roeser, Sabine. Risk, technology, and moral emotions. Routledge, 2017.
Roeser, Sabine, and Udo Pesch. “An emotional deliberation approach to risk.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41, no. 2 (2016): 274-297.
Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew, Alexa Weik von Mossner, and Wojciech P. Ma?ecki. “Empirical ecocriticism: Environmental texts and empirical methods.” ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 27, no. 2 (2020): 327-336.
Snowber, Celeste. “Dancing a curriculum of hope: Cultivating passion as an embodied inquiry.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 28, no. 2 (2012).
Snowber, Celeste. Embodied inquiry: Writing, living and being through the body. Springer, 2016.
Toivonen, Heidi, and Marco Caracciolo. “Storytalk and complex constructions of nonhuman agency.” Narrative Inquiry 33, no. 1 (2023): 61-90.
Van Balen, Bouke. “Can Communication Brain-Computer Interfaces Read Minds?” Phenomenology & the Cognitive Sciences, accepted 20 November 2024.
Van Grunsven, Janna, Lavinia Marin, Andrea Gammon, and Trijsje Franssen. “4E cognition, moral imagination, and engineering ethics education: Shaping affordances for diverse embodied perspectives.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2024): 1-23. Forthcoming.
Von Kleist, Heinrich, and Thomas G. Neumiller. "On the marionette theatre." The Drama Review 16, no. 3 (1972): 22-26.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Julia Rijssenbeek, Aafke Fraaije

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit manuscripts and publish with Inscriptions retain copyright to their original work and agree to the following terms:
- Inscriptions is granted the right to first publish the work under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License unless otherwise agreed in writing prior to publication;
- Inscriptions and its publisher Tankebanen forlag is granted the right to produce and reproduce the work in any form, printed or electronically, for free distribution and for sale;
- Authors are permitted to post their work online and to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of their work as long as its initial publication in Inscriptions is acknowledged.