Decision, betrayal, and faith
Kierkegaard’s commitment and loyalty to true faith
Søren Kierkegaard rejects the Kantian argument that the universal demand of ethics is the highest claim upon the individual. Whilst his Christian existentialism focuses on existence as ethical existence, within his existential framework the highest level of existence is the religious. Kierkegaard makes a distinction on this level between Religiousness A, or the last stage before faith; and Religiousness B, true Christianity. This essay explores the movement from religiousness A to B, and questions the location of the actual transition point, the boundary zone of humour. Since, for Kierkegaard, the divine is both immanent and transcendent, the fluidity of this boundary zone opens up the possibility that religious transition entails a double transcendence. This essay suggests that the highest point of Religiousness A is a movement to a certain form of the divine, whilst the absolute movement to Religiousness B is the reclamation of true faith.
–––. Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling. London: Continuum Press, 2010.
Evans, C. Stephen. Faith Beyond Reason: A Kierkegaardian Account. Michigan and Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1998.
–––. Kierkegaard’s Fragments and Postscript: The Religious Philosophy of Johannes Climacus. New Jersey: Humanities Press International, 1983.
Friedman, R. Z. “Kierkegaard: First Existentialist or Last Kantian?” Religious Studies 18, no. 2 (1982): 159-170.
Kant, Immanuel. Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone. Translated by Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Hudson. New York: Harper and Rowe Press, 1960.
Kierkegaard, Søren. Either/Or I and II. Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1987.
–––. Fear and Trembling. Translated by Alastair Hannay. London: Penguin Books, 1985.
–––. Fear and Trembling and Repetition. Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1983.
–––. Philosophical Fragments. Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1985.
–––. Philosophical Fragments. Translated by David F. Swenson and Howard V. Hong. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1962.
–––. The Concept of Anxiety. Translated by Reidar Thomte with Albert B. Anderson. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1980.
–––. Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits. Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993.
–––. Works of Love. Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1995.
Krishek, Sharon. “Two Forms of Love: The Problem of Preferential Love in Kierkegaard’s Works of Love.” Journal of Religious Ethics 6, no. 4 (2008): 595-617.
–––. Kierkegaard on Faith and Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Pattison, George. Kierkegaard and the Crisis of Faith: an Introduction to his Thought. Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1997.
–––. Kierkegaard’s Upbuilding Discourses: Philosophy, Literature, and Theology. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor Francis Group, 2002.
Quinn, Philip, L. “Kierkegaard’s Christian Ethics.” The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard. Edited by Alastair Hannay and Gordon D. Marino. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Shmuëli, Adi. Kierkegaard and Consciousness. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1971.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit manuscripts and publish with Inscriptions retain copyright to their original work and agree to the following terms:
- Inscriptions is granted the right to first publish the work under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License unless otherwise agreed in writing prior to publication;
- Inscriptions and its publisher Tankebanen forlag is granted the right to produce and reproduce the work in any form, printed or electronically, for free distribution and for sale;
- Authors are permitted to post their work online and to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of their work as long as its initial publication in Inscriptions is acknowledged.